Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Canfor Corporation v. United States of America; Terminal Forest Products Ltd. v. United States of America, Canfor and Terminal Reply to the Post-Hearing Submissions of the U.S.

12 Aug 2005
Canfor Corporation v. United States of America; Terminal Forest Products Ltd. v. United States of America, UNCITRAL (formerly Canfor Corporation v. United States of America; Tembec et al. v. United States of America; Terminal Forest Products Ltd. v. United States of America)
View case details
Canfor and Terminal Reply to the Post-Hearing Submissions of the U.S.
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Canfor and Terminal Reply to the Post-Hearing Submissions of the U.S.
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Albert Jan van den Berg
Arbitrator(s)
Armand de Mestral
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Keith E.W. Mitchell, Harris & Company, P. John Landry, Davis & Company, BakerHostetler, Elliot J. Feldman, Mark A. Cymrot, John J. Burke, Michael S. Snarr
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Canfor and Terminal Reply to the Post-Hearing Submissions of the U.S.
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.