Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi v. Turkmenistan, Partially Dissenting Opinion of Carolyn B. Lamm

8 Mar 2016
İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi v. Turkmenistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/24
View case details
Partially Dissenting Opinion of Carolyn B. Lamm
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Partially Dissenting Opinion of Carolyn B. Lamm
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Carolyn B. Lamm
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Veijo Heiskanen
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Sakmar Law Office, Turkey, Gregor Grubhofer, William Kirtley, Andrian Beregoi, Aceris Law
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & Mosle, Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & Mosle, U.S.A., Turkey, Gürel & Yörüker Law Firm, and Mexico City
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Partially Dissenting Opinion of Carolyn B. Lamm
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.