Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Oschadbank v. Russia (I), Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint, April 1, 2026

1 Apr 2026
Joint Stock Company "State Savings Bank of Ukraine" (JSC Oschadbank) v. Russian Federation (I), PCA Case No. 2016-14
Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Print reporter
Document Summary
Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Posture

This document is a Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint filed by the Plaintiff against the Russian Federation in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. The motion is brought pursuant to New York Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) Sections 5303 and 3213, which provide an expedited procedural mechanism for the recognition and enforcement of foreign country money judgments.

Relief Sought

The Plaintiff seeks an order recognizing a judgment rendered on July 1, 2025, by the Cour d'appel de Paris. Consequently, the Plaintiff requests the entry of a monetary judgment against the Russian Federation comprising $1,111,300,729.00 in principal damages, $731,400.00 in arbitration costs, and $3,134,907.34 in legal fees, expert witness fees, and related expenses. The motion further seeks the recovery of any accrued and unpaid interest on these amounts, alongside any other relief the Court deems just and proper.