Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Telefónica v. Colombia, Certificate Required by LCvR 26.1, June 2, 2026

2 Jun 2026
Telefónica, S.A. v. Republic of Colombia, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/3
Certificate Required by LCvR 26.1
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Certificate Required by LCvR 26.1
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Print reporter
Document Summary
Certificate Required by LCvR 26.1
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This document is a Certificate of Corporate Disclosure filed by the petitioner, Telefónica, S.A., pursuant to Local Civil Rule 26.1 of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The filing was submitted in the context of proceedings against the respondent, the Republic of Colombia.

The primary procedural purpose of this certificate is to identify any parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, or entities holding at least a ten percent ownership interest in the petitioner's stock that have outstanding securities in the hands of the public. Such disclosures are mandated to enable the presiding judicial officers to evaluate potential conflicts of interest and determine the necessity for recusal.

In this submission, counsel for the petitioner formally certified that Telefônica Brasil SA is the sole affiliated entity meeting the statutory disclosure criteria. The document contains no substantive legal arguments or requests for judicial relief, serving strictly as a mandatory administrative compliance filing within the broader procedural framework of the dispute.