Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

italaw181283 - Zeph Investments v. Australia (III), Australia's Press Release Regarding Swiss Federal Tribunal's Decision on Set-aside Application, August 5, 2026

5 Aug 2026
Zeph Investments Pte Ltd v. Commonwealth of Australia (I), PCA Case No. 2023-40
Australia's Press Release Regarding Swiss Federal Tribunal's Decision on Set-aside Application
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Australia's Press Release Regarding Swiss Federal Tribunal's Decision on Set-aside Application
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Australia's Press Release Regarding Swiss Federal Tribunal's Decision on Set-aside Application
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This document is a media release issued by the Australian Government on 5 August 2026, announcing the Swiss Federal Supreme Court's dismissal of set-aside proceedings initiated by Clive Palmer and his Singaporean corporate vehicle, Zeph Investment Pte Ltd, against the Commonwealth of Australia.

The underlying dispute involved an AUD 300 billion investor-State arbitration claim brought under the ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (AANZFTA). The claim concerned Western Australian legislation affecting the proposed Balmoral South Iron Ore Project. The arbitral tribunal previously issued a unanimous decision declining jurisdiction, finding that Zeph Investment Pte Ltd did not qualify as a protected investor with a covered investment under the applicable treaty framework.

The Swiss Federal Supreme Court rejected the applicants' challenges to the tribunal's jurisdictional award, confirming that the claimant did not meet the requisite criteria of a foreign investor entitled to treaty protections. Consequently, the Court upheld the tribunal's dismissal of the claims and ordered the applicants to bear the costs of the proceedings, concluding a legal defense by Australia that reportedly spanned over three years and incurred AUD 13 million in costs.