Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Sundance and Congo Iron v. Congo, Claimant's Press Release, March 25, 2021

25 Mar 2021
Sundance Resources Limited and Congo Iron SA v. Republic of Congo, ICC Case No. 26145/DDA/AZO (C-26344/AZO)
Claimant's Press Release
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Claimant's Press Release
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Claimant's Press Release
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This document is a public announcement issued by Sundance Resources Limited on March 25, 2021, declaring the formal commencement of international arbitration proceedings against the Republic of Congo. The dispute has been referred to the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), with the seat of arbitration designated as London.

The principal legal issue underlying the dispute concerns the alleged unlawful expropriation of a mining permit held by the claimant's subsidiary, Congo Iron SA, for the Nabeba iron ore project in the Sangha region. The claimant asserts that the underlying Mining Convention remains legally binding and in full force under Congolese law. Furthermore, the announcement outlines the claimant's position regarding the respondent State's subsequent actions, specifically challenging the legitimacy, transparency, and technical feasibility of agreements executed between the Republic of Congo and a third-party entity, Sangha Mining Development SASU, for the exploitation of the expropriated tenements.

The claimant maintains that the respondent State failed to engage in meaningful negotiations during an agreed 30-day extension period. Consequently, the claimant initiated formal arbitral proceedings to protect its investments, enforce its contractual rights, and seek appropriate relief for the alleged expropriatory measures.