Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Oschadbank v. Russia (I), Claimant's Letter to the Respondent Regarding Stay of United States Enforcement Proceedings, July 8, 2026

8 Jul 2026
Joint Stock Company "State Savings Bank of Ukraine" (JSC Oschadbank) v. Russian Federation (I), PCA Case No. 2016-14
Claimant's Letter to the Respondent Regarding Stay of United States Enforcement Proceedings,
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Claimant's Letter to the Respondent Regarding Stay of United States Enforcement Proceedings,
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Claimant's Letter to the Respondent Regarding Stay of United States Enforcement Proceedings,
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Context and Purpose

This document comprises correspondence dated 8 July 2026 from counsel for JSC State Savings Bank of Ukraine (Oschadbank) to counsel for the Russian Federation, filed as Exhibit B in related United States proceedings. The letter addresses the Russian Federation's request for a further stay of the English enforcement proceedings (Claim No. CL-2023-000502) pending the resolution of its appeal in cassation before the French courts regarding the underlying arbitral award dated 26 November 2018.

Parties' Positions on the Stay of Proceedings

Counsel for the Claimant characterizes the Respondent's cassation appeal against the 1 July 2025 judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal as a dilatory tactic devoid of legal merit. Nevertheless, to preserve judicial economy and minimize costs, the Claimant consents in principle to a limited stay of the English proceedings until the French Cour de cassation renders its judgment. Crucially, the Claimant rejects the Respondent's attempt to predicate the stay on a prospective revision application before the arbitral tribunal, noting that no such application is currently pending following the Paris Court of Appeal's decisions of 23 June 2026.

Reservations and Proposed Order

The Claimant expressly reserves all rights regarding the legal effects of the 23 June 2026 Paris Court of Appeal decisions, including whether they afford the Respondent any legitimate basis to initiate new revision proceedings. The letter concludes by enclosing an amended draft Consent Order reflecting the Claimant's conditional agreement to the stay, strictly limited to the pending cassation appeal, while rejecting the broader terms proposed by the Respondent.