Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

P&ID v. Nigeria, Judgment of the High Court of Justice of England ans Wales, November 22, 2019

22 Nov 2019
Process and Industrial Developments Ltd (P&ID) v. Nigeria Ministry of Petroleum Resources
Judgment of the High Court of Justice of England ans Wales
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Judgment of the High Court of Justice of England ans Wales
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Print reporter
Document Summary
Judgment of the High Court of Justice of England ans Wales
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Background

This ruling addresses an application by the Defendant, the Federal Republic of Nigeria, for an extension of time to comply with a condition attached to a stay of execution of an arbitral award. In a prior order dated 26 September 2019, the High Court granted Nigeria permission to appeal an enforcement order regarding a US$6.6 billion arbitral award in favor of Process & Industrial Developments Limited (P&ID). The stay of execution was conditioned upon Nigeria paying US$200 million into court within 60 days. Shortly before the deadline, Nigeria filed an extension application alongside a variation application seeking to revoke the condition entirely.

Parties' Positions

Nigeria argued that an extension was warranted due to a material change in circumstances, specifically alleging newly discovered evidence that the underlying contract and arbitral award were procured by fraud and bribery. Furthermore, Nigeria contended it was practically unable to meet the payment deadline due to national budget constraints and the lengthy legislative process required for a supplementary appropriation bill.

Court's Analysis and Decision

Mr Justice Butcher refused the extension application. The Court held that the fraud allegations, even if substantiated, did not justify delaying the security payment, as Nigeria could later seek the return of the funds if successful. Regarding the inability to pay, the Court found that Nigeria failed to demonstrate reasonable diligence. The Court noted that prompt steps were not taken following the original order, and alternatives such as securing a bank guarantee were explored too late in the 60-day period. Emphasizing the need for finality and compliance with court orders, the Court concluded there were no valid grounds to extend the compliance period and dismissed the application.