Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

P&ID v. Nigeria, Joint Status Report, March 6, 2023

6 Mar 2023
Process and Industrial Developments Ltd (P&ID) v. Nigeria Ministry of Petroleum Resources
View case details
Joint Status Report
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Joint Status Report
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Dennis H. Hranitzky, Debra O'Gorman
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Alexander D. Pencu, Christopher J. Major, Austin D. Kim
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Process and Industrial Developments Ltd., Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Meister Seelig & Fein, Nigeria
Country
United States
Print reporter
Document Summary
Joint Status Report
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This document is a Joint Status Report filed on March 6, 2023, before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, in the enforcement proceedings initiated by Process and Industrial Developments Limited (P&ID) against the Federal Republic of Nigeria and its Ministry of Petroleum Resources.

The parties submitted this report pursuant to the Court’s December 7, 2022, Minute Order, which directed them to provide an update on the status of Nigeria’s pending set-aside application before the English High Court of Justice. The parties informed the District Court that the English trial commenced as scheduled on January 16, 2023, and was expected to conclude on March 9, 2023, with a judgment to follow. Consequently, the parties jointly requested that the District Court’s existing stay order, entered on June 6, 2022, remain in place pending the resolution of the English proceedings.

The parties further committed to providing the District Court with a subsequent status update within ninety days, on or before June 5, 2023.