This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.
Procedural Posture
This document is a Complaint filed by Lupaka Gold Corp. against the Republic of Peru in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The Plaintiff seeks to enforce a June 30, 2025 arbitral award rendered by an International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) tribunal in favor of the Plaintiff, pursuant to the Canada-Peru Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
Factual and Legal Background
The underlying ICSID arbitration concerned the Parán Community's blockade and seizure of the Plaintiff's Invicta gold mine. The ICSID tribunal determined that the Parán Community acted as an organ of the State and exercised governmental authority. Consequently, the tribunal found Peru liable for breaches of the FTA's full protection and security, fair and equitable treatment, and expropriation provisions. The tribunal awarded the Plaintiff $40.4 million in damages, alongside pre- and post-award interest and costs.
Jurisdictional Basis and Relief Sought
In the present enforcement action, the Plaintiff asserts subject matter jurisdiction under the arbitral enforcement exception of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(6), and the federal statute implementing the ICSID Convention, 22 U.S.C. § 1650a. The Plaintiff contends that the District Court's role is strictly limited to examining the award's authenticity and enforcing its pecuniary obligations, without reviewing the merits or the tribunal's jurisdiction. Accordingly, the Plaintiff requests the entry of a money judgment enforcing the ICSID award in its entirety, totaling approximately $68.5 million inclusive of accrued interest and costs.