Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

SGS v. Benin, Judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal (I), February 9, 2023

9 Feb 2023
Société Générale de Surveillance S.A (SGS) v. Republic of Benin, ICC Case No. 22581/DDA
View case details
Judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal (I) (French)
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal (I) (French)
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Bénédicte Pruvost, Catherine Lefort, Raphaël Trarieux
Claimant's counsel
Emmanuel Jarry, Jalal El Ahdab
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Issakha Ndiaye, Blaise Adjalian
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Société Générale de Surveillance S.A (SGS), Benin, Ravet & Associés
Country
France
Print reporter
Document Summary
Judgment of the Paris Court of Appeal (I) (French)
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Background

This document is a judgment issued by the Paris Court of Appeal concerning an appeal filed by the Republic of Benin against an orientation judgment rendered by the Paris Execution Judge on May 12, 2022. The lower court had authorized Société Générale de Surveillance (SGS) to proceed with the real estate seizure of properties owned by Benin in Paris, enforcing an ICC arbitral award for a debt exceeding EUR 8.1 million.

Parties' Positions and Procedural Issues

Benin sought the annulment of the execution measures, arguing that the underlying arbitral award had been set aside by the Ouagadougou Court of Appeal, thereby extinguishing the debt. In response, SGS raised a procedural objection, asserting that Benin’s appeal was inadmissible under Articles 918 and 920 of the French Code of Civil Procedure. SGS contended that Benin failed to attach its substantive submissions (conclusions sur le fond) to the fixed-date summons (assignation à jour fixe).

Court's Analysis and Decision

The Court of Appeal strictly applied the procedural requirements governing fixed-date proceedings. It found that while Benin had attached the petition, the authorization order, and the declaration of appeal to the summons, it had omitted the substantive conclusions. The Court reasoned that this omission deprived the appellee of the ability to know the legal and factual grounds of the appeal at the time of the summons. Consequently, adhering to established jurisprudence of the French Court of Cassation, the Court declared Benin's appeal inadmissible.

In its dispositive ruling, the Court dismissed the appeal and ordered the Republic of Benin to bear the costs of the proceedings, alongside a mandate to pay EUR 3,000 to SGS pursuant to Article 700 of the French Code of Civil Procedure.