Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Djibouti v. Doraleh Container and Others, Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, July 30, 2024

30 Jul 2024
Republic of Djibouti, Djibouti Ports and Free Zone Authority, and Port de Djibouti SA v. Doraleh Container Terminal SA, DP World Djibouti FZCO and Dubai International Djibouti FZE (I), LCIA No. 142732
Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Print reporter
Document Summary
Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Posture

This document is a Judgment issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on July 30, 2024, in the appellate proceedings between Doraleh Container Terminal SA (Appellee) and the Republic of Djibouti (Appellant). The appeal was taken from a prior decision of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:20-cv-02571).

Decision and Operative Directives

Following oral arguments, the Court of Appeals ordered and adjudged that the underlying judgment of the District Court be vacated. The appellate court remanded the matter to the District Court with specific instructions to determine the legal authority of the law firm Quinn Emanuel to represent Doraleh Container Terminal SA in the proceedings. The Judgment was issued per curiam, in accordance with a majority opinion authored by Circuit Judge Rao and accompanied by a dissenting opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge Rogers.