Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

DP World and Doraleh v. Djibouti, Report and Recommendation of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, July 5, 2024

5 Jul 2024
DP World Djibouti FZCO and Doraleh Container Terminal SA v. Republic of Djibouti (II), LCIA Case No. 183886
Report and Recommendation of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Report and Recommendation of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Print reporter
Document Summary
Report and Recommendation of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Posture

This document is a Report and Recommendation issued by a United States Magistrate Judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. It addresses an unopposed petition filed by DP World Djibouti FZCO to recognize and enforce a foreign arbitral award against the Republic of Djibouti. The underlying arbitration was conducted under the rules of the London Centre for International Arbitration (LCIA), culminating in a Third Partial Final Award issued on January 20, 2022, in favor of the petitioner.

Jurisdictional Analysis

The court conducted a mandatory examination of its subject matter jurisdiction under Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act, which codifies the 1958 New York Convention. The Magistrate Judge determined that the arbitral award arose from a commercial legal relationship—specifically a concession agreement for a container terminal facility—thereby falling squarely within the Convention's purview. Furthermore, the court found that Djibouti had waived its sovereign immunity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) by acceding to the New York Convention and expressly agreeing to arbitrate disputes under the LCIA Rules.

Recommendation and Dispositive Relief

Noting the extremely limited scope of judicial review for arbitral awards and the respondent's formal Statement of Non-Opposition, the Magistrate Judge recommended granting the petition. The court advised that judgment be entered in favor of the petitioner for the calculated damages, which included lost management fees, lost dividends, and compounded interest, totaling approximately $189.9 million. The parties were further advised of their right to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days.