Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Enwell Energy plc v. Ukraine, Procedural Order No. 3 (Consent Order), June 26, 2026

26 Jun 2026
Enwell Energy plc v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/25/41
Procedural Order No. 3 (Consent Order)
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Procedural Order No. 3 (Consent Order)
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Procedural Order No. 3 (Consent Order)
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Background

This Procedural Order No. 3 (Consent Order) memorializes an agreement reached between Enwell Energy plc and Ukraine regarding the Claimant’s application for provisional measures. Following the Tribunal’s earlier Decision on Temporary Measures dated 10 April 2026, the Parties informed the Tribunal on 20 June 2026 that they had successfully negotiated an agreement on interim measures. Consequently, the Claimant withdrew its application and requested that the scheduled hearing be vacated and the prior decision be replaced by a formal consent order.

Tribunal's Decision and Operative Directions

Acting pursuant to its authority under ICSID Arbitration Rule 47, the Tribunal accepted the Parties' agreement. The Tribunal formally noted the withdrawal of the Claimant’s application and vacated both the scheduled hearing and its prior Decision on Temporary Measures, rendering the latter without effect from the date of this Order.

In its operative directions, the Tribunal ordered both Parties to provide four days’ written notice to the Tribunal and opposing counsel of any new proceedings or material changes in existing proceedings that might affect the Claimant’s rights concerning its Ukrainian subsidiaries or the integrity of the arbitral proceedings. Specifically, the Respondent is required to provide such notice regarding any request by the Prosecutor General to transfer control of the Claimant’s subsidiaries to the Ukrainian National Agency for Detection, Search and Management of Assets (ARMA), or any new application by the Security Service of Ukraine (SSU). Finally, the Tribunal reminded the Parties of their continuing obligation to litigate in good faith and to refrain from taking any actions that might aggravate the dispute.