Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Naftogaz v. Russia, Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, January 13, 2025

13 Jan 2025
NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine and others v. Russian Federation, PCA Case No. 2017-16
View case details
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
John D. Bates
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine, Russia
Country
United States
Print reporter
Document Summary
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This Order, issued by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, addresses the procedural posture of the enforcement proceedings initiated by NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine against the Russian Federation.

Following the submission of a joint status report and a stipulation by the parties, the Court considered the joint request to stay the current enforcement action pending the resolution of parallel set-aside proceedings concerning the underlying Final Award before the Hague Court of Appeal.

In light of the parties' agreement and the anticipated duration of the foreign proceedings, the Court ordered that the action be stayed until April 1, 2026. Furthermore, the Court directed the parties to file a joint status report no later than April 8, 2026. Given the extended nature of the requested stay, the Court administratively closed the action, noting that it remains subject to reopening upon the filing of a joint status report subsequent to the Hague Court of Appeal's decision in the set-aside proceedings.