Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Webuild (formerly Salini Impregilo) v. Argentina, Procedural Order No. 1, June 10, 2026

10 Jun 2026
Webuild S.p.A. (formerly Salini Impregilo S.p.A.) v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/39
Document provided by: ICSID
Procedural Order No. 1
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Procedural Order No. 1
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Country
Print reporter
Document Summary
Procedural Order No. 1
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

Procedural Background

This document constitutes Procedural Order No. 1 issued by the ad hoc Committee in the annulment proceeding initiated by the Argentine Republic against Webuild S.p.A. The Order memorializes the agreements reached by the parties and the Committee's directives following the First Session held by video conference on June 2, 2026.

Procedural Rules and Organization

The Committee established the foundational procedural framework governing the annulment phase, confirming the application of the ICSID Arbitration Rules in force as of April 10, 2006, mutatis mutandis. The Order addresses standard administrative matters, including the constitution of the Committee, the apportionment of advance payments to ICSID, and the designation of Washington, D.C. as the place of the proceeding. English and Spanish were designated as the procedural languages.

Evidentiary and Pleading Directives

The Committee set strict limitations on the introduction of new evidence, emphasizing that the annulment proceeding will rely primarily on the evidentiary record from the underlying arbitration. New evidence may only be admitted under special circumstances upon a reasoned written request, with a notable exception for documentary evidence submitted in support of a request to stay enforcement of the Award. The Order concludes by adopting a comprehensive procedural calendar, scheduling the exchange of written submissions on both the continuation of the stay of enforcement and the merits of the annulment application.