Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Vento Motorcycles v. Mexico, Judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada, September 18, 2025

18 Sep 2025
Vento Motorcycles, Inc. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/17/3
View case details
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Vento Motorcycles Inc., Mexico
Country
Canada
Print reporter
Document Summary
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This document constitutes a Judgment issued by the Supreme Court of Canada concerning an application for leave to appeal filed by the United Mexican States against Vento Motorcycles, Inc.

The procedural posture centers on the Applicant's request for appellate review of a prior judgment rendered by the Court of Appeal for Ontario (Docket No. COA-23-CV-1332, 2025 ONCA 82), dated February 4, 2025. The underlying domestic court proceedings pertain to the judicial review and enforcement of an international arbitral award involving the sovereign State and the corporate respondent.

In its dispositive ruling, the Supreme Court of Canada summarily dismissed the application for leave to appeal. The Court issued no substantive written reasons, as is customary for such dismissals, and ordered that the application be dismissed with costs awarded against the Applicant, the United Mexican States.