Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Segedin v. Croatia, Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, July 1, 2026

1 Jul 2026
Ljiljana Segedin v. Republic of Croatia, ICDR
View case details
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Trevor N. McFadden
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Croatia
Country
United States
Print reporter
Document Summary
Order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This document is a final, appealable Order issued by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the matter between Ljiljana Segedin and the Republic of Croatia. The Order serves as the dispositive instrument effectuating the reasoning set forth in the Court's concurrent Memorandum Opinion.

In its operative directives, the Court dismissed the Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice. Furthermore, the Court systematically denied a series of ancillary and substantive motions filed during the proceedings. Specifically, the Court denied the Motion to Deny Foreign Sovereign Immunity, the Motion to Seal Case, and the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.

Following these dispositive rulings, the Court directed the Clerk of Court to formally close the case, thereby concluding the proceedings at the district court level while expressly preserving the Plaintiff's right to appeal.