Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

italaw181029 - Segedin v. Croatia, Motion (TRO) for Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, June 16, 2026

16 Jun 2026
Ljiljana Segedin v. Republic of Croatia, ICDR
Motion (TRO) for Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Motion (TRO) for Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Entities
Print reporter
Document Summary
Motion (TRO) for Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This document is an emergency motion filed by the pro se Plaintiff, Ljiljana Segedin, before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The Plaintiff seeks a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and a Preliminary Injunction against the Defendant, the Republic of Croatia, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) and 18 U.S.C. § 1964.

The motion alleges that Croatia's state apparatus is engaged in retaliatory actions following the Plaintiff's initiation of a federal lawsuit and invocation of international arbitration. Specifically, the Plaintiff claims that Croatia is exerting "aggressive legal and administrative pressure" on Austrian authorities to compel her "involuntary cross-border extraction and surrender." The Plaintiff asserts that Croatia has manipulated trans-European legal mechanisms by using falsified, obsolete domestic addresses. The relief sought is an immediate cease and desist order to prevent Croatia and its ministries from pursuing her surrender, relocation, or passport cancellation. The Plaintiff also requests the Court to formally transmit any resulting protective order to the relevant Austrian ministries to provide notice of the U.S. court's jurisdiction and protection under principles of international comity.