Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

NextEra Energy v. Spain, Brief Amicus Curiae of Romania, Jun 4, 2025

4 Jun 2025
NextEra Energy Global Holdings B.V. and NextEra Energy Spain Holdings B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/14/11
Brief Amicus Curiae of Romania
Document Details:
LISTED PARTICIPANTS
Brief Amicus Curiae of Romania
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Claimant's law firm
Respondent's counsel
Respondent's law firm
Claimant's expert
Claimant's expert firm
Respondent's expert
Respondent's expert firm
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Third-party funder
Print reporter
Document Summary
Brief Amicus Curiae of Romania
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.

This amicus curiae brief was filed by the Government of Romania in the Supreme Court of the United States in support of the Kingdom of Spain's petition for a writ of certiorari. Romania argues that the Supreme Court should review the D.C. Circuit's decision in NextEra Energy Global Holdings B.V. v. Kingdom of Spain, which held that the arbitration exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) applies to enforce an arbitral award against a foreign state even where that state did not validly agree to arbitrate the dispute.

Romania contends that the D.C. Circuit's ruling broadens the FSIA's arbitration exception beyond its statutory text and legislative intent, which presuppose the existence of a valid arbitration agreement. The brief highlights that, under binding European Union law as determined by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in cases such as Achmea and Komstroy, arbitration agreements for intra-EU investment disputes are invalid. The D.C. Circuit's failure to recognize this principle, Romania argues, infringes upon the sovereignty of EU Member States, disregards principles of international comity, and creates a conflict of laws that could force states like Spain and Romania to violate their EU obligations.

Furthermore, the brief asserts that the D.C. Circuit's decision creates a circuit split with the Second and Fifth Circuits, which require a valid agreement to arbitrate for the FSIA exception to apply. Romania urges the Court to grant certiorari to resolve this split, ensure a uniform application of the FSIA, and prevent U.S. courts from becoming a forum for investors to circumvent the EU's established legal order. The brief emphasizes the importance of the U.S. speaking with "one voice" on matters of foreign sovereign immunity.