This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.
Procedural Framework and Timetable
This Procedural Order No. 1, issued by the Arbitral Tribunal in the PCA-administered arbitration between JSC Oschadbank and the Russian Federation, establishes the comprehensive procedural framework for the proceedings. The Tribunal, constituted under the 1976 UNCITRAL Rules, confirms Paris, France as the place of arbitration. A key feature of the order is its establishment of two distinct procedural timetables, contingent upon the Respondent's participation. Annex 1 provides an expedited schedule in the event the Russian Federation fails to participate, while Annex 2 sets out a more detailed timetable for a fully contested proceeding, including phases for written submissions, document production, and a hearing on jurisdiction, admissibility, and merits.
Evidence and Document Production
The Order provides detailed directives concerning written submissions, documentary evidence, and legal authorities. It specifies requirements for formatting, numbering, and the submission of both hard and electronic copies. For matters of evidence, the Tribunal notes that it may be guided by, but is not bound by, the 2010 IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration. The Order institutes a formal procedure for document production requests and objections, providing that unresolved disputes over production shall be submitted to the Tribunal for decision via a Redfern Schedule.
Witnesses, Experts, and Hearing Procedures
The Tribunal sets forth specific rules governing the content and submission of witness statements and expert reports, including requirements for affirmations of truth and statements of independence. The Order contemplates the potential for expert conferencing to produce joint statements on areas of agreement and disagreement. It also details the procedures for pre-hearing matters, such as the submission of an agreed chronology and list of issues, and outlines the protocol for the examination of witnesses and experts at the hearing, including direct, cross, and redirect examination, as well as questioning by the Tribunal. Provisions are made for live transcription of the hearing and the potential for post-hearing submissions if deemed necessary.