Mağdenli Yer Hizmetleri ve Taşıma Anonim Şirketi v. Kazakhstan, ICC

New
Short Name:

Case type:
International Investment Agreement (Investor–State)
Seat of Arbitration:
Investment treaty:
Kazakhstan - Turkey BIT (1992)
Applicable legal instruments:
Kazakhstan - Turkey BIT (1992)
Economic sector:
Other service activities
Outcome:
In Favour of Respondent(s)
Other remedy:
The Tribunal ruled that the Claimant must bear all expenses of the Arbitral Tribunal and the administrative expenses in an amount of around USD 500,000.
See case mapped on Investor-State LawGuide

Available documents

12 Nov 2018
Details:
This participant list is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.
Claimant appointee
Claimant appointee:
Şebnem Akipek Öcal
Respondent appointee
Respondent appointee:
Jeffrey Hertzfeld
Chair/President
Chair/President:
Giorgio Sacerdoti
Arbitrator(s)
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Azade Candemir, Bogac Cekinmez, Mert Cekinmez
Respondent's counsel
Patricia Nacimiento, Alessandro Covi, Niklas Fuchs, Sascha Bauer, Adilbek Tussupov, Herbert Smith Freehills
Other counsel
Entities
[field_entities]
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
[field_claimant_s_witness]
Respondent's witness
[field_respondent_s_witness]
Other witnesses
[field_other_witnesses]
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Annulment Committee president
Annulment Committee members
WTO members
[field_wto_appellate_body_memb]
WTO chair
[field_wto_appellate_body_chai]
Country
Print reporter
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.