Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

CME Czech Republic B.V. v. The Czech Republic, UNCITRAL

New
Short Name:

Case Type:
International Investment Agreement (Investor–State)
Applicable Procedural Rules:
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (1976)
Seat of Arbitration:
Applicable Treaty:
Czechia-Netherlands BIT (1991)
Applicable Legal Instruments:
Czech Republic-Netherlands BIT
See case mapped on Investor-State LawGuide

Available documents

Expert Opinion of Prof. J. Dedic (not public)
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


13 Sep 2001
Partial Award
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Partial Award
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Respondent appointee:
Jaroslav Hándl
Tribunal/Panel chair
Chair/President:
Wolfgang Kühn
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Partial Award
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


13 Sep 2001
Dissenting opinion of the Arbitrator JUDr Jaroslav Hándl against the Partial Arbitration Award
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Dissenting opinion of the Arbitrator JUDr Jaroslav Hándl against the Partial Arbitration Award
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Respondent appointee:
Jaroslav Hándl
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Dissenting opinion of the Arbitrator JUDr Jaroslav Hándl against the Partial Arbitration Award
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


22 May 2002
Legal Opinion submitted to the Svea Court of Appeal, Prepared by Christoph Schreuer and August Reinisch
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Legal Opinion submitted to the Svea Court of Appeal, Prepared by Christoph Schreuer and August Reinisch
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Legal Opinion submitted to the Svea Court of Appeal, Prepared by Christoph Schreuer and August Reinisch
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


20 Jun 2002
Legal Opinion Prepared by Christoph Schreuer and August Reinisch
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Legal Opinion Prepared by Christoph Schreuer and August Reinisch
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Legal Opinion Prepared by Christoph Schreuer and August Reinisch
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


14 Mar 2003
Final Award
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Final Award
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Respondent appointee:
Ian Brownlie
Tribunal/Panel chair
Chair/President:
Wolfgang Kühn
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Final Award
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


14 Mar 2003
Separate Opinion on the issues at the quantum phases of CME v. Czech Republic by Ian Brownlie, C.B.E., Q.C.
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Separate Opinion on the issues at the quantum phases of CME v. Czech Republic by Ian Brownlie, C.B.E., Q.C.
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Respondent appointee:
Ian Brownlie
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Separate Opinion on the issues at the quantum phases of CME v. Czech Republic by Ian Brownlie, C.B.E., Q.C.
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


30 Mar 2003
Comments Relating to Applicable Law on the Stockholm Tribunal's Final Award of 14 March 2003
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Comments Relating to Applicable Law on the Stockholm Tribunal's Final Award of 14 March 2003
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Comments Relating to Applicable Law on the Stockholm Tribunal's Final Award of 14 March 2003
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


15 May 2003
Challenge of Arbitral Award (judgement of SVEA Court of Appeal published at 42 ILM 919 (2003))
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Challenge of Arbitral Award (judgement of SVEA Court of Appeal published at 42 ILM 919 (2003))
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Country in which this occurs:
Sweden
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Challenge of Arbitral Award (judgement of SVEA Court of Appeal published at 42 ILM 919 (2003))
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.


1 Jan 2005
Expert Opinion of Prof. Giorgio Sacerdoti, 2005 (available at Transnational Dispute Management)
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Respondent appointee
Tribunal/Panel chair
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.