Notice: We are currently performing maintenance to improve the italaw platform. The site remains fully accessible. Thank you for your patience.

Stephane Benhamou v. Uruguay, UNCITRAL

New
Short Name:

Case Type:
International Investment Agreement (Investor–State)
Applicable Procedural Rules:
UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (1976)
Seat of Arbitration:
Applicable Treaty:
France-Uruguay BIT (1993)
Applicable Legal Instruments:
France-Uruguay BIT
Economic Sector:
Financial and Insurance Activities
Outcome:
In Favour of Respondent(s)
See case mapped on Investor-State LawGuide

Available documents

19 Dec 2002
Decision on Jurisdictional Objections (Spanish)
Document provided by: IA Reporter
Document Details:
PARTICIPANTS
Decision on Jurisdictional Objections (Spanish)
Participants listed are for this document only and may not include all participants involved in the entire case. Always consult the original documents.
Claimant appointee
Claimant appointee:
François Lasry
Respondent appointee
Respondent appointee:
Jorge Talice
Tribunal/Panel chair
Chair/President:
Andrés Rigo Sureda
Arbitrator(s)
Sole Arbitrator
ICSID Annulment Committee president
ICSID Annulment Committee members
WTO Appellate Body members
WTO Appellate Body chair
Judges
Claimant's counsel
Respondent's counsel
Other counsel
Claimant's expert
Respondent's expert
Claimant's witness
Respondent's witness
Other witnesses
Tribunal secretary
Tribunal assistant
Country
Print reporter
Entities
Document Summary
Decision on Jurisdictional Objections (Spanish)
This summary note is machine-generated. Always consult the original materials.