Christer Söderlund

Participant Type: 

Individual

Involved in 12 cases (11 International Investment Agreement (Investor–State) · 1 Contract (Investor–State)) · evidenced by 58 case documents on record

Tribunal Chair / President 4 cases in this role

• Blue Bank International & Trust (Barbados) Ltd. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB 12/20 View case details
  1 source document

  • Blue Bank International & Trust (Barbados) Ltd. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Award
• Cementos La Union S.A. and Aridos Jativa S.L.U v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/29 View case details
  2 source documents

  • Award and Separate Opinion
  • Decision on Annulment
• I.M. Badprim S.R.L. v the Russian Federation, SCC Case No. V 172/2010 View case details
  2 source documents

  • Addendum to Final Award
  • Final Award
• Puma Energy Holdings (Luxembourg) SARL v the Republic of Benin, SCC Case No. SCC EA 2017/092 View case details
  1 source document

  • Puma Energy Holdings (Luxembourg) SARL v the Republic of Benin, Emergency Award

Arbitrator 4 cases in this role

• Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, PCA Case No. 2018-56  View case details
  21 source documents

  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Award
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Amended Procedural Calendar (as of June 11, 2019)
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Claimants Exhibits and Legal Authorities
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Claimants Letter to PCA
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Claimants Memorial on Jurisdiction
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Claimants Reply to Respondent Answer on Jurisdiction
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Claimants' Reply to Respondent's Answer on Jurisdiction
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Colombia's Response to the Claimants' Request for Arbitration
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Notice of and Request for Arbitration
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, PCA Letter to the Parties
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, PCA Letter to the Parties
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Procedural Order No. 1
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Procedural Order No. 1 (amended)
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Respondent Observations on the United States Non-Disputing Party Submission
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, Terms of Appointment
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, United States Article 10.20(2) Submission
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia, United States Letter to PCA
  • Alberto Carrizosa Gelzis, Enrique Carrizosa Gelzis, Felipe Carrizosa Gelzis v. Republic of Colombia,Amended Procedural Calendar
  • Claimants Observations on the United States Non-Disputing Party Submission
• Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia, ICSID Case No. ARB/18/5 View case details
  13 source documents

  • Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia, Award of the Tribunal
  • Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia, Claimant's Memorial on Jurisdiction
  • Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia, Claimant's Reply on Jurisdiction
  • Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia, Hearing on Jurisdiction: Transcript Day 2
  • Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia, Hearing on Jurisdiction: Transcript Day 3
  • Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia, Hearing on Jurisdiction: Transcript Day 4
  • Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia, Procedural Order N0. 1
  • Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia, Procedural Order No. 2
  • Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia, Procedural Order No. 4
  • Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia, Respondent's Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction
  • Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia, Respondent's Rejoinder on Jurisdiction
  • Astrida Benita Carrizosa v. Republic of Colombia, Respondent's Rejoinder on Jurisdiction
• Carlos Sastre and others v. Mexico, ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/2 View case details
  7 source documents

  • Award of the Tribunal
  • Carlos Sastre and others v. Mexico, Procedural Order No. 3
  • Carlos Sastre and others v. Mexico, Procedural Order No. 4
  • Carlos Sastre and others v. Mexico, Procedural Order No. 5
  • Carlos Sastre and others v. United Mexican States, Procedural Oder No. 1
  • Carlos Sastre and others v. United Mexican States, Procedural Order No. 2 (Decision on Bifurcation)
  • Procedural Order No. 6
• Quiborax S.A., Non Metallic Minerals S.A. and Allan Fosk Kaplún v. Plurinational State of Bolivia, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/2 View case details
  3 source documents

  • Quiborax S.A., Non Metallic Minerals S.A. and Allan Fosk Kaplún v. Plurinational State of Bolivia, Annulment Procedural Order No. 1
  • Quiborax S.A., Non Metallic Minerals S.A. and Allan Fosk Kaplún v. Plurinational State of Bolivia, Decision on Annulment
  • Quiborax S.A., Non Metallic Minerals S.A. and Allan Fosk Kaplún v. Plurinational State of Bolivia, Decision on Claimants Request to Lift Provisional Stay of Enforcement of the Award

ICSID Annulment Committee 3 cases in this role

• Continental Casualty Company v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/9 View case details
  3 source documents

  • Continental Casualty Company v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on Argentina’s Application for a Stay of Enforcement of the Award
  • Continental Casualty Company v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on the Application for Partial Annulment, and the Application for Partial Annulment
  • Continental Casualty Company v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on the Claimant’s Preliminary Objection to Argentina’s Application for Annulment
• Sempra Energy International v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/16 View case details
  3 source documents

  • Sempra Energy International v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on Sempra Energy International’s Request for the Termination of the Stay of Enforcement of the Award
  • Sempra Energy International v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on the Argentine Republic’s Application for Annulment of the Award
  • Sempra Energy International v. The Argentine Republic, Decision on the Argentine Republic’s Request for a Continued Stay of Enforcement of the Award (Rule 54)
• Sociedad Anónima Eduardo Vieira v. República de Chile, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/7 View case details
  1 source document

  • Sociedad Anónima Eduardo Vieira v. República de Chile, Decision of the ad hoc Committee of the Application for Annulment by the Claimant

Counsel (Respondent side) 1 case in this role

• Franz Sedelmayer v. Russian Federation, SCC View case details
  1 source document

  • Mr. Franz Sedelmayer v. The Russian Federation, Decision of the Stockholm District Court on the Set-Aside Application (Swedish)